The Maui County Council is studying whether Maui could take advantage of the cost savings in professional management vs elected mayor. The majority of U.S. counties have a professional manager with a degree in administration and experience managing county services. You can comment on this by emailing pia.committee@mauicounty.us
Mark Hyde, a proponent of going to professional management estimates Maui county could save $60,000,000 a year by changing to professional management of county operations..
In “Smarter, Faster, Cheaper: An operations efficiency benchmarking study of 100 American cities,” IBM’s David Edwards examined publicly available data on factors such as population, geographic size, collective bargaining, and the like that are conventionally assumed to contribute to a city’s efficiency. What he found was that in reality, these factors had little impact on municipal efficiency. Instead, Edwards’s findings suggest that the determining factor in how efficiently a city deployed resources is management. He defines management as “the ability of government leaders to make strategic and operational decisions about what services will be provided to which citizens at what level” and how.
Edwards learned, for example, that cities with city manager forms of government are nearly 10 percent more efficient than cities with strong mayor forms of government, a finding which validates the assumption that placing executive authority with a professional manager who is not involved in the politics of running the city leads to more efficiently managed communities. “…[M]anagers are important,” writes Edwards. “They influence outcomes.”
Tom Cook
I think the current system works best for the people. The Mayor is elected by the people and can be replaced if they feel he or she is not doing a good job. A managing director would not represent the people directly.
Saying it saves money is only part of the story.
I vote a strong NO on this issue.